HAL will be down for maintenance from Friday, June 10 at 4pm through Monday, June 13 at 9am. More information
Skip to Main content Skip to Navigation
Conference papers

The least-cost theorems in environmental economics: A third way between idealized Pareto optimality and traditional regulation

Abstract : In the late 1960s, new environmental policies emerged that attempted to reach predetermined emissions standards in a cost effective way: i.e., the ‘standard-and-tax’ approach (Baumol and Oates [1971]) and the market system approach (Dales [1968]). Although they belong to different traditions, namely, Pigovian versus Coasean, and are frequently contrasted in the literature today, these least-cost solutions in fact emerged at the same time and for the same reasons. They both addressed the same dual issue: first, they tried to promote incentives-based policies as opposed to traditional standards that they considered to be inefficient; and at the same time, they attempted to find alternatives to the Pigovian tax, which is optimal but that they considered to be unworkable. So, more broadly, they emerged as a kind of compromise between the direct controls favored by regulators at that time and the idealized Pareto optimal policies.
Complete list of metadata

https://hal.univ-reims.fr/hal-02095912
Contributor : Nathalie Berta Connect in order to contact the contributor
Submitted on : Wednesday, April 10, 2019 - 8:48:06 PM
Last modification on : Wednesday, November 3, 2021 - 7:38:41 AM

Identifiers

  • HAL Id : hal-02095912, version 1

Collections

Citation

Nathalie Berta. The least-cost theorems in environmental economics: A third way between idealized Pareto optimality and traditional regulation. Economics and the environment since the 1950s: history, methodology, philosophy, Nathalie Berta, Romain Debref, Franck-Dominique Vivien (REGARDS, Reims University), Cahiers d'économie politique/Papers in political economy, Mar 2019, Reims, France. ⟨hal-02095912⟩

Share

Metrics

Record views

30