La portee normative des rescripta ad consultationem emissa sous Constantin - Université de Reims Champagne-Ardenne Access content directly
Journal Articles Fundamina Year : 2014

La portee normative des rescripta ad consultationem emissa sous Constantin

Abstract

This study aims to revisit the Constantinian texts concerning rescripts ad consultationem emissa. Do these rescripts have the value of precedents, applicable by analogy to similar cases, as they did during the classical period? Does the prince's reply merely constitute an advisory opinion that will leave the judge in control of the case, or does it constitute the final judgment? In June 318 Constantine seems to have taken a definite decision - the judge loses control over the case as soon as he refers it to the prince; the prince, supreme authority and sole interpreter of the law, is then the only one to pass final judgment.

Keywords

Domains

Law
Fichier principal
Vignette du fichier
Fundamina_2014_ALL.pdf (233.51 Ko) Télécharger le fichier
Origin : Publisher files allowed on an open archive

Dates and versions

hal-03615442 , version 1 (21-03-2022)

Licence

Attribution

Identifiers

  • HAL Id : hal-03615442 , version 1

Cite

Aude Laquerrière-Lacroix. La portee normative des rescripta ad consultationem emissa sous Constantin. Fundamina, 2014, 20 (2), pp.527-535. ⟨hal-03615442⟩

Collections

URCA MSH-URCA
22 View
27 Download

Share

Gmail Facebook X LinkedIn More